Skip to content

Resources

Why not keep using spreadsheets?

Spreadsheets and folders work, until the audit or the handover. Here is where they stop, and what that costs you.

The tools you already use

Each is good at something. Be precise about where the fit ends.

Spreadsheets & Word / PDF templates

Good at

The fastest way to start: track joints, log heat numbers, fill a template that prints a tidy document. For a small job under one code with one reviewer it's reasonable — and we'd rather say so than sell you a platform you don't need yet.

Where it stops
  • No computed ranges — the sheet holds the numbers you typed but doesn't know a qualification tested at one thickness covers a band of production thicknesses, so the judgement lives in someone's head.
  • No enforced hold points — a cell can be filled in before the inspection it depends on has happened, and nothing stops it.
  • The dossier is rebuilt at the end — someone gathers files from several folders, checks each matches the revision that applied, and hopes nothing was edited in place. That's where the hours and the audit risk concentrate.

Welding document generators

Good at

They turn your inputs into clean, correctly laid-out WPS, PQR and WPQ paperwork, and save the tedium of formatting a procedure by hand. If you need a good-looking document from values you've already decided, they deliver it.

Where it stops
  • They don't reason — they record the essential variables but don't compute the qualified range, so the document tells you what was tested, not what it covers.
  • They treat each document in isolation — when a weld must satisfy more than one regime at once (EN ISO 15614 and ASME IX, or PED layered on EN 1090), a generator prints two documents but won't reconcile them or flag where a variable qualified under one falls short under the other.

A horizontal or generic QMS

Good at

Document control, approval workflows, non-conformity tracking and an audit trail — the scaffolding of a managed process, across your whole organisation, not just the workshop. If your aim is to show a process exists and is followed, it covers that.

Where it stops
  • No depth — it routes a document for approval but doesn't know what a welding procedure is, that a welder's qualification has an expiry and continuity requirement, or that an NDT report belongs to a specific technique and acceptance class.
  • No code engine underneath — no essential variables, no qualified ranges — so the domain judgement stays in the same spreadsheets you were trying to leave.
  • No one-click MRB or MDR — it holds your documents but doesn't assemble the sealed, ordered handover dossier a client expects, because it doesn't understand the shape of that dossier.

What Worgify does differently

Two things the tools above leave to you.

Everything else is ordinary software. This is the whole wedge.

The dossier is built as the work happens.

Every qualification, inspection and report is captured where it happens, against the rule revision in force, and linked as it's created. Nothing to reconstruct at the end: the MRB or MDR is the accumulated work, ordered and sealed.

The engine is code-aware.

Worgify reads the essential variables and computes the qualified range: what a qualification really covers, a warning when production falls outside it, the same weld reconciled across regimes. The regime (EN 1090, PED, ASME IX, EN 15085, ISO 3834) is a layer, not a copy of your data.

When the simpler tool is the right one.

If you run occasional work under a single code, with one reviewer and no client demanding a formal dossier, a spreadsheet and a good template will serve you — and adopting a platform would be overhead you don't need.

Worgify earns its place when the range judgements, the hold points, the multi-regime reconciliation and the sealed MRB stop being occasional annoyances and become the work itself. Not sure which side of that line you're on? That's a fair thing to talk through, not a reason to buy.

Bring us a job you run on spreadsheets today.

We'll work through it with you and tell you plainly whether Worgify earns its place — or whether your current tools are fine.