Suite · You fabricate & weld
One system from the assembly breakdown to the sealed dossier — whatever code the job runs under.
Request a demoCertificates, test reports, heat numbers and sign-offs are chased across folders and inboxes in the last weeks before handover.
Cost: Weeks of engineering time on every job, and margin lost to delay
Whether a welder or a procedure covers this joint is answered from memory or from a spreadsheet nobody maintains.
Cost: Rework, and findings at the audit that should never have been findings
The same weld exists in the drawing list, the NDT request and the quality record — with three chances to disagree.
Cost: Traceability that breaks exactly where it is needed most
Modules in this suite
Each writes to the same job, so nothing is entered twice. You buy the suite — every module is included.
The weld got made, but the record of who welded it, under which procedure, with which consumable and heat, is scattered across a traveller, a whiteboard and someone's memory — and reassembled at handover.
Whether a procedure or a welder covers this joint is usually answered from memory, or from a spreadsheet that stopped being maintained two projects ago.
A hold point is only a control if somebody is stopped by it. On paper it is a row in a spreadsheet that gets ticked afterwards.
A nonconformance raised in welding, found by NDT and dispositioned by engineering usually lives in three systems and agrees with itself in none of them.
When an auditor asks which certificate covers the plate in this joint, the answer is a hunt through a folder of PDFs and a hope that the heat number on the plate matches one of them.
The dossier is assembled by hand in the last weeks of a job, from folders and inboxes, by the people who can least afford the time.
One or several, job by job. The regime is a layer on the same backbone — not a different product.
The common denominator. EN 1090-2 requires it at every execution class — the level rising with the class (EXC1 → ISO 3834-4, EXC2 → 3834-3, EXC3/4 → 3834-2) — the pressure world adopts it as the welding quality system, and ASME Section IX is its qualification counterpart outside Europe.
Read the UNI EN ISO 3834 pillar →The route to placing a structural component on the European market. EN 1090-1 governs conformity assessment and factory production control; EN 1090-2 governs how the steel is actually executed, in four execution classes.
Read the EN 1090 pillar →The European route for pressure equipment above 0.5 bar. Risk categories drive the conformity assessment module, and from category II upward the welding personnel and procedures must be approved by a notified body or recognised third-party organisation.
Read the PED 2014/68/EU pillar →The railway sector's own welding regime. Certification levels CL1 to CL3 track the highest weld performance class a manufacturer produces; CL4 covers organisations that do not weld but design, procure, maintain or operate. Welding coordination requirements are stricter than the general case.
Read the EN 15085 pillar →The American route, and the code most often specified on work outside the European Union — dominant in North America and the Gulf. Procedure and performance qualification through essential, supplementary essential and nonessential variables.
Read the ASME BPVC Section IX pillar →Who runs it
Same suite — the sector only changes the code you work to. Open yours for the pains and the regime that apply.
Structural steel on Monday and a pressure vessel on Tuesday is the same shop, not two companies. Worgify Fabrication is one system for the work; the regime you have to satisfy is a layer you switch on per job.
The NDT on your own welds is here. In-house examination — visual, PT, MT, UT, RT — of the work you make is part of Fabrication; you do not need a separate product for it. Worgify NDT is the other thing: for companies whose business is inspecting other people’s work.
